AI is being used to make decisions about people and to watch them, often without clear notice or rules. This cause pushes for transparency so people know when AI affects them, and for firm limits on AI-powered surveillance. Winning means clear disclosure, consent, and enforceable guardrails—especially for government use.
No open cycle
This cause does not have an open cycle right now. Your grant status is still available in the dashboard.
AI transparency & surveillance rules
19
DAYS LEFT42,518
Votes
$20,554
Raised
$84,545
Sponsors
States move to rein in facial recognition policing
Why this matters now
AI can shape real outcomes, like whether you get a loan or whether police treat you as a suspect. When these systems are hidden, people cannot understand decisions or challenge mistakes.
AI-driven surveillance tools like facial recognition can also misidentify people. Those errors can lead to wrongful arrests, damage trust, and chill free speech when people feel watched.
What's blocking progress
Agencies and companies often resist disclosure, citing safety needs or trade secrets. Poorly written rules can also face First Amendment and legal challenges, slowing progress.
Strategies
Choose which strategies should receive funding this cycle.
0 grant votes available this cycle
Ballot edits are currently read only.
Community discussion
Start a discussion
Sign in to postDiscussion posting still runs on the legacy demo auth path and stays isolated from the Phase 1 Supabase backend.
- No threads yet. Be the first to post once the legacy discussion path is migrated.
Impact stories
Impact updates will appear here after the first cycle closes.