Use investigative journalism and advocacy campaigns to name and shame the worst actors.
Use investigative reporting and advocacy to make denial patterns visible and create reputational costs for the worst actors. Publish a “report card” style view of complaints and denials and amplify concrete stories of delayed or denied care. Keep messaging precise so it targets misconduct without undermining trust in Medicare coverage.
Why this works
- Plans care about their star ratings and public image.
- If certain big insurers get a reputation for mistreating seniors, they may lose enrollment (or fear loss enough to change practices).
- Media attention also bolsters the case for regulators and lawmakers to act; it’s harder for industry to lobby against oversight if nightly news segments are exposing wrongdoing.

Toxic-Free Future
Tax-deductibleScience-driven advocacy and research to eliminate toxic chemicals like PFAS.
Mechanism
About MediaHow Toxic-Free Future uses funding
- Compile rankings or report cards using complaints, oversight findings, and plan denial patterns described in the cause materials.
- Publish explainers on prior authorization and appeal rights in plain language.
- Elevate beneficiary stories that show how improper denials delay care.
- Coordinate outreach and PSAs with seniors’ organizations.
- Time media bursts to CMS oversight actions and congressional hearings.
- Maintain a sustained drumbeat rather than one-off spikes.
Milestones
Checkpoints and the expected timing for each step
- 1
Report card framework set
Near termMetrics and sources for comparisons are defined.
- 2
First investigative package published
Near termStories launch with clear senior-facing guidance.
- 3
Campaign sustained
OngoingRegular updates keep attention on compliance.
- 4
Policy response triggered
During oversight momentsCoverage is cited in enforcement actions or hearings.

