No open cycle

This cause does not have an open cycle right now. Your grant status is still available in the dashboard.

Stop anticompetitive health care mergers
Litigation

Litigation (DOJ/AG Lawsuit and Beyond)

Continue to pursue the DOJ-led antitrust lawsuit to fully block the merger in court.

Support a disciplined court strategy that turns the competitive harm case into a durable legal outcome. Build and reinforce the record with evidence, expert support, and aligned legal briefs so the merger is blocked—or, if a deal is allowed to proceed, the outcome still preserves real competition in local markets. This work is time-sensitive while the litigation posture and any settlement talks are still in motion.

Why this works

  • Litigation is currently the central path – it directly challenges the merger on legal grounds and, if successful, results in a clear win (deal blocked).
  • It also sets a precedent for future cases (judicial decisions shape antitrust enforcement).
  • The involvement of multiple state Attorneys General shows a united front, adding weight.
Center for Food Safety logo

Center for Food Safety

Tax-deductible
centerforfoodsafety.org

Public-interest advocacy using litigation, policy, and grassroots action to protect health and the environment from industrial agriculture.

Center for Food Safety (CFS) is a public-interest environmental advocacy group that uses litigation, policy, and grassroots organizing to protect human health and the environment from harms of industrial agriculture.

How Center for Food Safety uses funding

  1. Map the litigation timeline and decision points where support can matter.
  2. Build the record with evidence and expert support tied to the core harm theory.
  3. Coordinate aligned legal filings that reinforce the requested remedy.
  4. Evaluate settlement proposals against competition outcomes, not just paperwork.
  5. Plan for appeal and compliance follow-through so remedies hold up over time.

Milestones

Checkpoints and the expected timing for each step

  1. 1

    Litigation support plan locked

    Near-term

    Decision windows, needed evidence, and aligned filing opportunities are mapped.

  2. 2

    Record-building support delivered

    During active litigation

    Evidence and analysis are incorporated into briefs or other supporting materials.

  3. 3

    Settlement posture evaluated

    If negotiations emerge

    Proposed terms are reviewed against competition outcomes and gaps are documented.

  4. 4

    Decision and follow-through plan set

    Post-decision

    Next steps for appeal and/or compliance monitoring are documented quickly.

Risks, trade-offs & sources

Updates

No updates yet.

Updates will appear here as the strategy progresses.

0votes left
Using bonus
0