No open cycle

This cause does not have an open cycle right now. Your grant status is still available in the dashboard.

Stop anticompetitive health care mergers
Lobbying

Supporting Competitors & Market Solutions

Encourage and support the growth of alternative, independent home health providers and hospice companies to maintain competition.

Reduce harm by strengthening independent providers and making sure any divested assets become real competitors, not placeholders. Use policy support, stakeholder coordination, and practical capacity-building so seniors and families keep nearby options even if consolidation proceeds. This is a longer-horizon approach that complements litigation and remedy monitoring, especially in local markets where choice is already thin.

Why this works

  • Strengthening competitors mitigates harm – for instance, if BrightSpring (KKR-owned) is not ideal, maybe regional hospital systems or nonprofits could expand home health services as an alternative.
  • Some state Attorneys General might facilitate local buyers for any assets sold.
  • By focusing on building a competitive ecosystem (like spurring innovation in at-home care tech for new entrants), we reduce reliance on one giant.

Families USA

Advocacy
familiesusa.org

Voice for health care consumers

Families USA is a leading national nonprofit advocacy organization dedicated to achieving high-quality, affordable health care and improved health for all Americans. Founded in 1981, Families USA amplifies the voices of health care consumers in policy debates:. It played a key role in shaping and defending the Affordable Care Act and continues to push for expanding coverage, lowering health costs, and addressing health equity.

How Families USA uses funding

  1. Identify where local competition is most at risk and what options exist today.
  2. Support capacity-building for independent and nonprofit providers that can serve those areas.
  3. Advocate for policies that do not structurally disadvantage smaller providers.
  4. Coordinate with enforcers so divestiture buyers (if used) are viable and independent.
  5. Monitor contracting and referral dynamics for signs competitors are being squeezed out.

Milestones

Checkpoints and the expected timing for each step

  1. 1

    Local competition risk map completed

    Near-term

    Priority markets and the most vulnerable service gaps are identified and documented.

  2. 2

    Independent-provider support plan launched

    Early implementation

    Concrete supports and partnerships are in place to strengthen alternatives.

  3. 3

    Divestiture buyer viability reviewed

    If divestitures are used

    Buyers are assessed for independence and ability to operate competitively.

  4. 4

    Post-merger monitoring cadence set

    Post-decision

    A repeatable process tracks whether choice and competition are being preserved.

Risks, trade-offs & sources

Updates

No updates yet.

Updates will appear here as the strategy progresses.

0votes left
Using bonus
0