Support FTC and state AG cases that seek injunctions, refunds, and penalties for deceptive enrollment and cancellation obstacles (starting with Uber-style pa...
Back high-profile enforcement cases that force concrete product changes at major platforms, starting with the Uber One pattern described here. Build strong records and aligned remedies so injunctions, refunds, and penalties create real deterrence—not just a one-off headline. This strategy matters most while federal rulemaking is contested and case-by-case enforcement is the clearest near-term lever.
Why this works
- Creates deterrence fast and forces concrete product changes at major platforms.
Idaho Rivers United
Tax-deductibleStatewide river conservation nonprofit protecting Idaho’s rivers, salmon, and communities.
Mechanism
About LitigationHow Idaho Rivers United uses funding
- Identify the most consequential cases and decision windows where support can matter.
- Build the record with consumer experiences, documentation, and credible analysis.
- Coordinate aligned legal support and public updates tied to filings and hearings.
- Push for remedies that change enrollment and cancellation flows, not just paper commitments.
- Track compliance and follow-through after orders or settlements so changes stick.
Milestones
Checkpoints and the expected timing for each step
- 1
Priority case support plan set
Near-termTarget cases, decision windows, and evidence needs are mapped and assigned.
- 2
Record-building materials delivered
During active litigationDeclarations, documentation, and analysis are prepared and routed to the appropriate channels.
- 3
Remedy posture aligned
Ahead of key hearings or settlement talksDesired injunction and consumer-relief outcomes are clearly defined and communicated.
- 4
Compliance follow-through launched
Post-order or settlementA monitoring cadence is established to verify cancellation changes persist over time.