In the interim, use Congress’s existing powers: introduce joint resolutions of disapproval for specific deals (as was done for Saudi, UAE, etc.).
Use the tools Congress already has to force scrutiny and votes on the most egregious proposed transfers. Even when measures fail or face veto, they can raise the political cost and build a repeatable oversight muscle. This strategy is the “fast path” while longer-term reforms are still being built.
Why this works
- Can succeed with enough pressure (Congress did block aid to Saudi via War Powers resolution in 2019, though vetoed).
- At minimum it forces debate – e.g.
- Omar’s 2021 resolution against the $650m Saudi sale garnered significant attention.
- If one or two such resolutions pass (or deter a sale), it sets precedent that human rights are a deciding factor.
Win Without War
AdvocacyProgressive coalition advocating for a more peaceful U.S. foreign policy
Mechanism
About LobbyingHow Win Without War uses funding
- Monitor proposed sales and identify the highest-priority decision windows.
- Draft and introduce resolutions of disapproval with aligned sponsors.
- Coordinate stakeholder outreach and public messaging tied to the vote timeline.
- Use hearings, letters, and public commitments to increase scrutiny and cost.
- Track outcomes and set a playbook for the next deal, not just the current one.
Milestones
Checkpoints and the expected timing for each step
- 1
Priority deal and sponsor plan set
Near-termThe target transfer, key offices, and vote timeline are identified and shared.
- 2
Resolution introduced and coalition activated
During the notification windowA formal measure is filed and coalition outreach aligns to the procedural clock.
- 3
Vote and accountability moment delivered
Ahead of transfer approvalDebate and recorded votes occur, with a clear public record of positions.
- 4
Next-deal playbook updated
Post-voteLessons and improved tactics are documented for the next oversight fight.