Test consumer products and water; educate the public and policymakers.
Raise PFAS salience by turning complex exposure problems into clear, decision-ready information. This strategy funds testing and compilation, publishes maps and reports, and translates results into stories and briefings that support bans, cleanup, and enforceable standards.
Supported this cycle by
Why this works
Details coming soon.
Environmental Working Group
Tax-deductibleNonprofit research and advocacy driving safer chemicals, clean water, and transparent food systems.
Mechanism
About MediaHow Environmental Working Group uses funding
- Define the next decision window and the specific outcomes the communications push should support.
- Conduct or compile testing and publish maps and reports that people can use.
- Translate findings into a simple narrative and clear calls to action for policymakers and the public.
- Distribute through press outreach, community channels, and digital campaigns tied to key moments.
- Monitor and respond to confusion and counter-messaging so the story stays accurate and focused.
Milestones
Checkpoints and the expected timing for each step
- 1
Testing + narrative plan set
0–30 daysPriority outputs, audiences, and decision windows are defined with a publication schedule.
- 2
First map or report published
1–3 monthsA report is released with plain-language takeaways and a distribution plan.
- 3
Policymaker briefing kit delivered
2–4 monthsBriefings and materials are delivered ahead of a key legislative or regulatory moment.
- 4
Sustained update cadence operating
3–6 monthsUpdates and rapid responses keep attention aligned to actionable outcomes.